free beagles logo here
 



DPP v Orum
[1988] 3 All ER 449, [1989] 1 WLR 88, 88 Cr App Rep 261, 153 JP 85, [1988] Crim LR 848, 132 Sol Jo 1637

CRIMINAL LAW, EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE - OFFENCES AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT AND THE PUBLIC - OFFENCES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER - RIOT, VIOLENT DISORDER, AFFRAY ETC - FEAR OR PROVOCATION OF VIOLENCE; HARASSMENT, ALARM OR DISTRESS - THREATENING WORDS OR BEHAVIOUR — CONDUCT LIKELY TO CAUSE HARASSMENT, ALARM OR DISTRESS — OFFENSIVE CONDUCT CONDUCIVE TO BREACHES OF PEACE

A police officer is capable of being ‘a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress’ by ‘threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour’, for the purposes of s 5(1) of the Public Order Act 1986. However, if he is not likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress by the words or behaviour used it is not likely that he will be able to arrest the person using the threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour under s 5(4) for offensive conduct, since the officer, if he is the only person present, will not be in a position to suspect that an offence under s 5(1) has been committed.


This article is for information purposes only; its aim is to let people to know their full rights under UK law. Nothing on these pages is absolute as the law is always changing; if in doubt contact a trusted solicitor for further advice. We do not encourage you to break the law.

Please feel free to copy and distribute these articles to fellow activists, but do not alter the text in any way. These articles are anti-copyright for non-commercial purposes. Please visit www.freebeagles.org for the latest version of our articles and to learn about the freeBEAGLES Ethical Open Document License under which this document is distributed.

If you see any errors, or we have missed any changes to the legal situation please contact us as soon as possible, at info@freebeagles.org, as wrong information can prove costly to people's freedom.

© Copyright freeB.E.A.G.L.E.S.; last updated: November 2003