|
|
1. Introduction
2. Breach of the Peace
3. Harassment
4. Obstruction of the Highway
5. Aggravated Trespass
In Britain we have what is known as a common law legal system. Decisions made by higher courts are binding on the courts below them in accordance with the system of judicial precedent. In civil and criminal proceedings, the role of the judge or magistrate is to apply the law to the facts in any particular case. However this is not always easy as legislation is often ambiguous and open to different interpretations. In such cases it is the job of the higher courts to decide how legislation is to be interpreted. Their decision is then binding on all future cases, where the facts are sufficiently similar.
For example, the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 prohibits a course of conduct which causes harassment, alarm or distress. But it was unclear from the wording of the act, whether or not it could also be used to protect companies from harassment. In a case before the High Court it was decided that companies could not be protected, as this was not the intention of Parliament when passing the legislation. This decision is now binding on all the courts below.
There are also some criminal offences which are known only as common law offences. These are offences which have been developed entirely by the courts over the years, and for which there is no actual legislation. Examples of common law offences are murder, perverting the course of justice and causing a public nuisance and causing a breach of the peace.
The House of Lords is the highest court in the land and its decisions on both civil and criminal cases are binding on all other domestic courts. Next down are the civil and criminal divisions of the Court of Appeal, which is bound by the House of Lords, but binds all courts below. Then there are the civil and criminal divisions of the High Court. Its decisions only bind the Crown and magistrates courts. The lowest courts - the Crown and magistrates court for criminal and the County Court for civil cases cannot bind any other court.
The cases listed below are divided up in to the different areas of law affecting activists and listed chronologically, starting with the oldest first. For each case listed we have included a summary, the full text (where available) and an explanation of what the case means and how it may affect activists.
Thomas v Sawkins (1935)
Full text,
summary, explanation
Albert v Lavin (1982)
Full text, summary,
explanation
R v Howell (1982)
Full text, summary,
explanation
DPP v Orum (1988)
Full text, summary,
explanation
McConnell v Chief Constable of the Greater Manchester Police (1990)
Full text, summary,
explanation
McLeod v Metropolitan Police Commissioner (1994)
Full text,
summary, explanation
Percy v DPP (1995)
Full text, summary,
explanation
Foulkes v Chief Constable of the Merseyside Police (1998)
Full tex,t, summary,
explanation
Porter v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis (1999)
Full text, summary, explanation
Redmond-Bate v Director of Public Prosecutions (1999)
Full text, summary,
explanation
Bibby v Chief Constable of Essex Police ( 2000)
Full text, summary,
explanation
Maguire v Chief Constable of Cumbria Constabulary (2001)
Full text, summary,
explanation
McQuade v Chief Constable of Humberside Police (2001)
Full text, summary,
explanation
McGrogan v Chief Constable of Cleveland Police (2002)
Full text, summary,
explanation
Williamson v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police (2003)
Full text, summary,
explanation
R (on the application of Laporte) v Chief Constable of the
Gloucestershire Constabulary
Full text, summary,
explanation
Huntingdon Life Sciences v Curtin (1) (1997)
Full text, summary, explanation
Huntingdon Life Sciences v Curtin (2) (1997)
Full text, summary,
explanation
R v DPP ex parte Moseley (1999)
Full text, summary,
explanation
R v Mann (2000)
Full text, summary, explanation
Lau v DPP (2000)
Full text, summary,
explanation
King v DPP (2000)
Full text,
summary, explanation
Tuppen v Microsft Corporation Ltd (2000)
Full text, summary, explanation
DPP v Dunn (2000)
Full text, summary,
explanation
R v DPP (2001)
Full text, summary,
explanation
R v Hills (2001)
Full text,
summary, explanation
Bishop v Uxbridge Magistrates Court (2001)
Full text,
summary, explanation
DPP v Ramsdale (2001)
Full text, summary,
explanation
Pratt v DPP ( 2001)
Full text, summary,
explanation
Caurti v DPP (2001)
Full text, summary,
explanation
Thomas v News Group Newpapers Ltd (2001)
Full text, summary,
explanation
Kelly v DPP(2002)
Full text, summary,
explanation
DPP v Dziurzynski (2002)
Full text, summary,
explanation
Huntingdon Life Sciences v Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (1) (2003)
Full text,
summary, explanation
Daiichi UK Ltd v Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (2003)
Full text, summary,
explanation
Huntingdon Life Sciences v Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (2) (2004)
Full text,
summary, explanation
Nagy v Weston (1965)
Full text, summary,
explanation
Hirst and Agu v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire (1987)
Full text, summary,
explanation
Kent County Council v Curtis (1998)
Full text, summary, explanation
DPP v Jones (1999)
Full text, summary,
explanation
Westminster City Council v Haw (2002)
Full text, summary, explanation
Winder v DPP (1996)
Full text, summary,
explanation
Hibberd v DPP (1996)
Full text, summary,
explanation
Nelder and others v DPP (1998)
Full text, summary,
explanation
Tilly v DPP (2001)
Full text, summary,
explanation
DPP v Bayer (2003)
Full text,
summary, explanation
This article is for information purposes only; its aim is to let people to know their full rights under UK law. Nothing on these pages is absolute as the law is always changing; if in doubt contact a trusted solicitor for further advice. We do not encourage you to break the law.
Please feel free to copy and distribute these articles to fellow activists, but do not alter the text in any way. These articles are anti-copyright for non-commercial purposes. Please visit www.freebeagles.org for the latest version of our articles and to learn about the freeBEAGLES Ethical Open Document License under which this document is distributed.
If you see any errors, or we have missed any changes to the legal situation please contact us as soon as possible, at info@freebeagles.org, as wrong information can prove costly to people's freedom.
© Copyright freeB.E.A.G.L.E.S.; last updated: July 2004